SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 3206

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3330 - TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Ari Suryanarayana Rao – Appellant
Versus
Mannam Nagendramma – Respondent


APHC010565152024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3330]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 310/2025 BETWEEN:

Ari Suryanarayana Rao ...PETITIONER AND Mannam Nagendramma ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. J M NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent:

1.--

The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.310 of 2025

ORDER:

The respondent/plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.141 of 2001 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Addanki, against the petitioner/defendant for recovery of an amount of Rs.50,000/- basing on the promissory note, dated 19.05.1998. Despite service of summon personally through Court, the defendant was called absent and he was set ex parte on 19.07.2001. Thereby, considering the evidence adduced by the respondent/plaintiff, the said suit was decreed on 30.07.2001 in favour of the respondent/plaintiff against the petitioner/ defendant and ordered to pay an amount of Rs.68,000/- with subsequent interest and costs.

2. I.A.No.156 of 2010 in O.S.N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top