SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 5948

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3330 - TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Anakka Yasodhara Raju – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF AP – Respondent


ORDER:

The 2nd respondent herein filed a private complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C.”) vide C.C.No.41 of 2017 on the file of learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Eluru, to take cognizance against the petitioner/accused for the offences punishable under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short “N.I Act”).

2. The petitioner/accused filed an application vide Crl.M.P.No.1584 of 2019 in C.C.No.41 of 2017 on the file of learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Eluru, under Section 311 of Cr.P.C., for summoning the witness Sri.K.Someswara Rao, Station Writer of Eluru III Town Police Station, to appear before the Court and to give evidence.

3. In the said application the petitioner/accused asserted that, he lodged a report against the husband of the 2nd respondent/complainant in Crime No.130 of 2016 of Eluru III Town Police Station under Section 506 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(X) of the Schedule Castes and the Schedule Tribes (Prevention of atrocities) Act, 1989 and the FIR was registered by the station writer of Eluru III Town police station, he is crucial w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top