SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 26119

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., – Appellant
Versus
SMT. PATHINA RAMANAMMA & ANOTHER – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

The appellant is second respondent in M.V.O.P.No.1138 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VI Addl. District Judge, at Visakhapatnam, and the respondents are the Petitioner/Claimant and 1st respondent in the said case.

2. Both the parties in the appeal will be referred as they are arrayed in the claim application. The Claimant has filed Claim Petition under section166 of MV Act of r/w 455, for claiming compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a motor Vehicle accident occurred on 26.08.2006.

3. The case of the claimant is that he is earning Rs.3,000/- per month by doing agriculture labour works and that on 26.08.2006 at about 6 pm, the claimant along with her husband were returning from their field at Butchiyyapeta Village, at that time an auto bearing No. AP 31 Y 3845 driven by the 1strespondent in a rash and negligent manner with high speed dashed to the injured and that the claimant received grievous injuries.

4. The 1st respondent remained ex parte before the Tribunal. The 2nd respondent - insurance company filed a counter denying the claim and further pleaded that the driver of the auto is not having any kind of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top