SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 974

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B.S. BHANUMATHI, J
N.Ramesh Babu – Appellant
Versus
G.Purnachandra Rao – Respondent


Advocates:
BUGULU SREETEJA, V.N.V.SURYA DATTU

ORDER

This revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is preferred against the order, dated 22.01.2024, dismissing I.A.No.140 of 2022 in O.S.No.21 of 2013 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Piler, filed by the defendant under Order VII rule 11 CPC to reject the plaint.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The revision petitioner herein is the 1st defendant and the 1st respondent is the plaintiff.

4. The case of the petitioner/1st defendant, as stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, is as follows:

a. The plaintiff filed the suit against the defendants for recovery of damages on the ground that they have done malicious acts against the plaintiff. The defendants filed written statement resisting the suit.

b. The plaintiff is doing jaggery business and has dealing with the 1st defendant. On the assurance of the plaintiff, the 1st defendant snet a jiggery load, i.e., 340 bags each weighing 50 Kgs each worth of Rs.1,39,400/- in a lorry bearing No.AP 16 X 5182., vide way bill No.3791889, dated 29.05.2024. On 20.05.2024, the driver of the vehicle handed over the load to the plaintiff at Jaggayyapeta in the godown of the plaintiff an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top