HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
N.KUMAR BABU – Appellant
Versus
NARRAVULA VENKAMA NAIDU – Respondent
ORDER:
1st defendant in the suit filed the above revision against the order dated 11.11.2022 in I.A.No.2598 of 2022 in O.S.No.57 of 2016 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Puttur.
2. Respondents herein, being the plaintiffs filed suit O.S.No.57 of 2016 for perpetual injunction. Schedule property consists of two items. A-schedule property is an extent of Ac.0-15 cents in Sy.No.157/5, and B-schedule is an extent of Ac.0-12 cents in Sy.No.157/6 of Aranyam Kandriga Village of Narayanavanam Mandal of Chittoor District.
3. Pending the suit, plaintiff filed I.A.No.2598 of 2022 under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC to amend the plaint for want of declaration of title in respect of plaint A-schedule properties and for consequential injunction.
4. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it was contended inter alia that recently plaintiffs came to know that the defendants got stray entry in the revenue records pertaining to B-schedule property. However, the plaintiffs have been in possession and enjoyment of the B-schedule property; that basing on entry, defendants are claiming B- schedule mentioned property and hence, filed the petition seeking amendment to declare title of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.