SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 26812

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
N.KUMAR BABU – Appellant
Versus
NARRAVULA VENKAMA NAIDU – Respondent


ORDER:

1st defendant in the suit filed the above revision against the order dated 11.11.2022 in I.A.No.2598 of 2022 in O.S.No.57 of 2016 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Puttur.

2. Respondents herein, being the plaintiffs filed suit O.S.No.57 of 2016 for perpetual injunction. Schedule property consists of two items. A-schedule property is an extent of Ac.0-15 cents in Sy.No.157/5, and B-schedule is an extent of Ac.0-12 cents in Sy.No.157/6 of Aranyam Kandriga Village of Narayanavanam Mandal of Chittoor District.

3. Pending the suit, plaintiff filed I.A.No.2598 of 2022 under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC to amend the plaint for want of declaration of title in respect of plaint A-schedule properties and for consequential injunction.

4. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it was contended inter alia that recently plaintiffs came to know that the defendants got stray entry in the revenue records pertaining to B-schedule property. However, the plaintiffs have been in possession and enjoyment of the B-schedule property; that basing on entry, defendants are claiming B- schedule mentioned property and hence, filed the petition seeking amendment to declare title of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top