SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21387

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B KRISHNA MOHAN, J
PINNAMANENI PADMAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.3.

This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent No.3 in not considering the representations of the petitioner dated 09.05.2023, 27.08.2022 and 21.02.2022 for mutation of her name in the Devasthanam records for the plot No.14 situated at Door No.2-3-63 opposite to Karivenavanisatram, Srisailam temple, Srisailam, Kurnool District.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner purchased the right to run the Bunk upon a lease granted infavour of one Smt Ketawath Nagamallamma by the respondent No.3-Devasthanam through a lease deed dated 16.08.2014 which was executed on a stamp paper. According to it, the orginal lessee by name Smt Ketawath Nagamallamma, sold the right to run the bunk in the subject land by taking a sum of Rs.2,00,000 from the petitioner and the petitioner is running the bunk for the present in the subject land by paying the necessary lease amount and other charges to the respondent No.3-Devasthanam.

Hence, relying upon the said document dated

16.08.2014, the petitioner approached the respondent No.3 to mutate her name in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top