Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Sri Ravi Nath Tilhari, J
R. Subba Rao – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Vigilance Officer, The Cotton Corporation of India Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. departmental enquiry initiated after criminal cases. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments against the continuation of enquiry. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's analysis on simultaneous proceedings. (Para 14 , 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 4. doctrine on handling simultaneous disciplinary and criminal cases. (Para 20 , 21 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed; proceedings to continue. (Para 48) |
1. Heard Sri Adhitya Harsha Vardhan for M/s. Pillix Law Firm representing the petitioner and Ms. K.Durga Lavanya, learned counsel, representing Sri M.Venkata Krishna Rao, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the following relief:-
“ It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declare the action of the respondents in proceeding with the departmental enquiry in pursuance of the Memorandum of Charges Dated 15-06-2010 before conclusion of the criminal case pending against the petitioner before Hon’ble Special Judge for CBI Cases, Visakh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
