SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MOHAMMED SAIFULLAH – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMMED SATHYAVANI @ SAFEENA, & 2 OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['A K KISHORE REDDY', 'PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', '', 'E SAMBASIVA PRATAP']

ORDER:

1) Heard Sri. A.K. Kishore Reddy, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri. E. Sambasiva Pratap, the learned Public Prosecutor. With their consent, the Criminal Petition is disposed of through BlueJeans video conferencing app.

2) Originally, the 1st Respondent/wife along with 2nd Respondent [her Son] filed M.C. No. 19 of 2009 before IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kakinada, East Godavari District, under Section 125 Cr.P.C., claiming maintenance @ Rs.5,000/- per month to the 1st Respondent and @ Rs.3,000/- per month to 2nd Respondent herein. By its Judgment, dated 19.09.2011, the learned Magistrate allowed the M.C., granting maintenance @ Rs.2,000/- per month to the 1st Respondent/wife and Rs.1,000/- per month to 2nd Respondent/son; apart from directing the Petitioner/husband to pay costs of Rs.1,000/-. Aggrieved by the same, the Petitioner/husband herein preferred Criminal Revision Petition No. 90 of 2011, before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District. Vide Judgment, dated 24.06.2013, the learned Sessions Judge, dismissed the said revision. Assailing the Order, dated 24.06.2013, passed in Criminal R.C. No. 90 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top