SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO W.P.Nos.9599, 9600, 9601, 9602, 9659, 9690, 10078, 10405, 10409, 10410, 10641, 10643, 12722 and 13020 of 2021

Advocates:
['CHALLA GUNARANJAN', 'GP', 'C SUDESH ANAND', 'G VIJAYA KUMAR', 'VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S']

COMMON ORDER:

All these writ petitions have been filed by various medical colleges offering medical education in the State of Andhra Pradesh. They are aggrieved by G.O.Ms.No.42, dated 15.04.2021 issued by the State of Andhra Pradesh notifying the fee structure for Post-graduate Medical courses conducted by the petitioners for the block period 2017-2018 to 2019-2020. The Association of Private Medical and Dental Colleges has also filed W.P.No.9690 of 2021.

2. As these writ petitions are on the same issue and challenge the same Government Order, a common order is being passed in all these cases.

3. The fee structure for post-graduate medical courses in the State of Andhra Pradesh for the block period 2017-2018 to 2019-2020 was notified by G.O.Ms.No.70, Health, Medical and Family Welfare (C-1) Department, dated 03.05.2017 on the basis of a consensual agreement dated 02.05.2017 between the State and the Association of the Private Medical Colleges (petitioner in W.P.No.9690 of 2021). This G.O. along with other G.Os were challenged by the students studying in these courses by way of W.P.(PIL).No.131 and 132 of 2017 and batch. The said writ petitions were disposed of by a Division Bench of this Court on 20.01.2021 with certain directions. The said directions are –

1. The discretion to fix the fees payable to private institutions is, subject to regulation by the State, with the private institutions.

2. The State cannot regulate the fees, in any manner it deems fit. The regulation by the State or any instrumentality of the State is restricted to ensuring that the proposed fee does not involve profiteering or collection of capitation fee.

3. The fee proposed by each private institution needs to be verified and regulated on an individual basis and a common uniform fees cannot be fixed as a general fee payable to every institution.

4. The observations and directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in T.M.A. Pai, Islamic Academy and P.A. Inamdar, would be applicable to matters regulated under G.O.Ms.No.6, dated 08.01.2007. The guidelines in G.O.Ms.No.6, dated 08.01.2007, are to be interpreted and controlled by the directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

5. The challenge to G.O.Ms.No.70 Health, Medical & Family Welfare (C1) Department, dated 03.05.2017, is rejected.

6. The consensual agreement dated 02.05.2017 to the extent of fixation of fees and consequently G.O.Ms.No.72 Health, Medical & Family Welfare (C1) Department, Dated 03.05.2017 and G.O.Ms.No.77 Health, Medical & Family Welfare (C1) Department, Dated 06.05.2017, are set aside on the ground that they fall foul of the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Islamic Academy and P.A. Inamdar and are also not in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.6, dated 08.01.2007.

7. The private institutions shall submit their statements of expenditure incurred, in relation to the courses covered under G.O.Ms.No.72 and G.O.Ms.No.77, for the year 2017-2018, along with all supporting documents to the Commission within two weeks of this Judgement.

8. The Commission shall scrutinise all the documents to arrive at the expenditures incurred by the private institutions for the year 2017-2018. For this purpose the Commission can call for all such information and documents it deems fit from the private institutions for the purposes of arriving at the actual expenditures of the private institutions. This exercise shall be completed within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the expenditure details from the private institutions.

9. The private institutions shall co operate with the Commission and produce all documents required by the Commission.

10. The Commission shall inform the private institutions of the expenditure being accepted by the Commission, and propose the fees, in accordance with the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the guidelines in G.O.Ms.No.6, dated 08.01.2007, for the block period 2017-2018 to 2019-2020 and give an opportunity to the private institutions to file such objections a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top