SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

L R SATYANARAYAN, VIZIANAGARAM DIST – Appellant
Versus
K CHINNAMMA, VIZIANAGARAM DIST – Respondent


ORDER:

This civil revision petition is filed against the order dated 22.01.2016 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, in E.A.No.942 of 2015 in E.P.No.268 of 2011 in O.S.No.731 of 2007 whereby the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge dismissed the said application filed by the petitioner herein/JDR seeking to set aside the sale and permit him to deposit the EP amount.

2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the petitioner is the judgment debtor, the 1st respondent is the decree holder, and the 2nd respondent is the auction purchaser of the E.P. schedule property. The petitioner filed an application under Order XXI Rule 89 of CPC in E.A.No.942 of 2015 in E.P.No.268 of 2011 in O.S.No.731 of 2007 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, seeking to set aside the sale of auction conducted on 22.06.2015 and permit him to deposit the EP Amount, claiming that he secured the amount payable in the E.P., and he is ready to deposit the same. The said application was dismissed by the Court below vide order dated 22.01.2016 on the ground that the application is barred by limitation.

Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred the present revision.

3. Heard S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top