SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 15993

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
SYED SIRAJ AHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
THE AP STATE WAKF BOARD – Respondent


ORDER:

01. The short grievance of the petitioner is that, the impugned proceeding dated 15.09.2022, issued by the 1st respondent is contrary to the orders passed in W.P.No.13481 of 2015, dated 08.06.2015, as the 1st respondent has no jurisdiction to appoint a committee under the said proceedings.

02. Heard Sri Md.Saleem, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mohammed Gayasuddin, learned Standing counsel for respondent No.1 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Minorities Welfare Department.

03. Sri Md.Saleem, learned counsel for the petitioner, in elaboration to what has been stated in the affidavit contended that, earlier the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing a Writ Petition No.13481 of 2015 questioning the office order where under a person was authorized and directed him to conduct election and this Court allowed the said Writ Petition and set aside the office order by taking into consideration the submissions made by the then learned Standing Counsel for AP Wakf Board that the executive officer has no power to appoint any person for conducting election as the mosque was not registered.

04. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that, in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top