SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 17034

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NYAPATHY VIJAY, J
N. Prabhakar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
V. Gopinadh – Respondent


Advocates:
M L NEELIMA, T V JAGGI REDDY

O R D E R:

The present revision is filed against the order dated 17.10.2022 in I.A.No.2274 of 2022 in I.A.No.916 of 2022 in O.S.No.90 of 2022 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Puttur.

2. The petitioner is the defendant. The suit O.S.No.90 of 2022 was filed by the respondent/plaintiff seeking permanent injunction against the petitioner/defendant with regard to the suit schedule properties i.e. ‘A’ Schedule property consisting of an extent of Ac.0.38 cents in Sy.No.113/19 of Nennuru Grama Panchayat, Ramachandra Puram Mandal, Tirupati District and ‘B’ Schedule property consisting of same extent i.e. Ac.0.38 cents in Sy.No.113/9 of same village. The petitioner/defendant filed written statement disputing the identity of the ‘B’ schedule property and that the documents of the property are not connected with the ‘B’ schedule property. As per the petitioner/defendant, plaint ‘B’ schedule property is not in the Sy.No.113/19, but it is in Sy.No.109/1 of Nennur Village. The defendant also filed an application I.A.No.916 of 2022 to appoint an Advocate Commissioner for the purpose of localization and identification of the disputing 'B’ schedule property. The said application was dismiss

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top