SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 25727

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MUNGI VIJAYAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. The Writ Petition is being disposed of, at the stage of admission, with the consent of both the counsel.

2. The present Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the 4th respondent in issuing Notice under Section 7 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 to the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary etc., and for a consequential direction to the respondents not to take further steps in the matter.

3. The learned counsel for petitioner, inter alia, submits that earlier a notice was issued to the petitioner under the provisions of the Madras Land Encroachment Act and challenging the same a Writ Petition was filed vide W.P.No.6631 of 2022. He submits that the said Writ Petition was disposed of by an order dated 21.03.2022, by setting aside the notice impugned therein and the respondents were granted liberty to issue fresh notice under proper acknowledgment and to follow due process of Law. The learned counsel submits that the respondents issued the notice impugned in the present Writ Petition without considering the material submitted by the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top