Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K Manmadha Rao, J
Kummara Mohan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed under article 226. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner contests appointment, alleging illegality. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. eligibility criteria for appointment as district judge. (Para 7 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. court examines procedural adherence in appointments. (Para 8 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. government must follow recommendations of the selection committee. (Para 10 , 11 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. court's directives for fresh credential verification. (Para 30 , 31) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
“…..it is humbly prayed to call for the records pertaining to G.O.Rt.No.8, dated 03.02.2022 through which the 2nd respondent was appointed as President of District Commission and consequently direct the respondents to rectify the injustice meted out to the petitioner as illegal, violative of provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 r/w the Consumer Protect (Qualification for Appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of the President and Members of the State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 (hereinafter referred as Rules) and unconstitutional and c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
