SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 92

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
Garapati Ratnakumari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
P NARASIMHA RAO, GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

ORDER

The present writ petition is filed declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing impugned proceedings dated 07.10.2023 cancelling the authorization of petitioner as fair price shop dealer in respect of shop No.0505024 of Nandigudem Village, Gopalapuram Mandal, East Godavari District as illegal, arbitrary and without following principles of natural justice.

2. The case of the petitioner in brief is that the petitioner herein is appointed as a fair price shop dealer on permanent basis in respect of the shop No.0505024 of Nandigudem Village, Gopalapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. Later in the year 2002, an inspection was conducted and subject stock was seized and confiscated and the petitioner was kept under suspension vide order dated 26.08.2002. Later, the petitioner preferred an Appeal before the Joint Collector against the suspension order dated 26.08.2002. The 2nd respondent was pleased to revoke the suspension order and to reinstate the petitioner vide order dated 05.10.2002.

3. While things stood thus, the 3rd respondent initiated proceedings dated 25.07.2023 alleging that the petitioner was indulging in clandestine business and diverted the stocks for his pecun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top