SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 11704

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J
KANCHI LAKSHANNA DORA VSP DIST – Appellant
Versus
PRL SECY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVP. GUNTUR DIST AND 4 OT – Respondent


ORAL ORDER:

Heard Sri M.Rama Mohan, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M.Bala Subrahmanyam, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Ms. M.Rose, Ld.

Counsel appearing on behalf of Panchayat Raj.

2. The prayer made in the Writ Petition is as under:

“Hence it is prayed that this Hon’ble court may pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the 3rd & 4th respondents to receive the property tax for the years 2015-16 for assessment No.521 and D.No.2-150 in PL Puram Gram Panchayat, Payakaraopeta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and also for future years whenever house tax due arises from the petitioner as the petitioner is legally bound to pay the house tax and refusing to receive the house tax by the 3rd and 4th respondents for the aforesaid property without assigning any reason whatsoever and especially when there is no injunction or any other order restraining the Gram Panchayat by any civil court or any authority from receiving the house tax from the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble court deems fit and proper in the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top