ORDER:

Heard Sri A.S.K.S.Bhargav, learned Counsel for the Petitioners/Defendants 1 and 2 and Sri Peta Gnana Teja, learned Counsel for the 1st Respondent/Plaintiff.

2. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order, dated 31.01.2024, rendered on I.A.No.689 of 2023 in O.S.No.136 of 2016 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, whereby the trial Court was pleased to dismiss the petition filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, to send agreement of sale, dated 02.01.2014 (Ex.A1) to the handwriting expert for comparison of admitted signature of the petitioner with that of the disputed signatures.

3. This Court has been observing that several Civil Revision Petitions are being preferred on account of rejection of similar interlocutory applications. In a large number of cases, interlocutory applications are made after the cross-examination of the Plaintiff and seeking reference of the documents relied upon by the Plaintiff to the handwriting expert. The Suits in which such applications are invariably made, are specific performance suits, money recovery suits based on pronotes and cheques etc., i.e. in general the Plaintiff‟s claim is canvassed on