SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 20246

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
MANDALA PRAVEEN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


ORDER:

The short grievance of the petitioner is that, the unofficial respondents have encroached land in Sy.No.635 and also unauthorizedly and illegally formed layout in Sy.No.650/1 of Koduru (West) Revenue Village of Railway Koduru Mandal in Annamayya District which is the Tank Poramboke (Gunjana River) and the authorities did not take any action in spite of making a representation through Spandana dated 30.05.2023 about the illegal acts of the respondents 9 to 14.

2. Heard Smt. P.Archana, learned counsel, representing Smt. Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri E.Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

3. Smt. P.Archana, learned counsel, in elaboration to what has been stated in the affidavit contended that, in spite of bringing to the notice of the authority concerned by way of a representation through Spandana about the encroachments

2 RC, J that were made by the unofficial respondent and about the formation of unauthorised layout in the land classified as Tank Poramboke (Gunjana River), so far, no action has been taken by the respondents and they did not act upon the said representation. As such, the pres

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top