SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 13181

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J
G RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent


ORDER

The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“… to issue a writ, order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus ...

(a)To declare the proceedings in R.Dis.No.12024(42)/1/ 2021, date 05.08.2022 of the 2nd respondent i.e., Commissioner of Endowments, A.P., Vijayawada granting exemption under the provisions of Act 30/87 except Sec.80 to the 6th respondent institution as bad, illegal, without jurisdiction, contrary to Section 154 of the Act 30/1987 and set aside the same;

(b) and consequently direct the respondents that the affairs of the 6th respondent institution Sri Nalamvari Choultry, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District to be continued to be administered by the Endowment Department through the Executive Officer appointed Unser Section 29 of Act 30/87 (c) and pass such other order or orders as the Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case”.

2. The 6th respondent, a charitable trust, having income of more than Rs.50.00 lakhs, is notified under Section 6(a) of Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act. The 6th respond

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top