SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9354

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3369 - T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
MOGARALA NAGESWARA RAO GUDUR TOWN NELLORE DISTRICT – Appellant
Versus
BONDILLI CHANDRA SINGH GUDUR TOWN NELLORE DISTRICT – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

1. The appeal, under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is filed by the appellant/plaintiff challenging the decree and judgment dated 04.11.2009 in O.S. No.16 of 2006 passed by the Additional District Judge-cum-Family Court, Nellore (for short, ‘trial court’).

2. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as arrayed before the trial court.

3. The plaintiff's claims in the plaint are summarized as follows: (a) The defendant agreed to sell the schedule property for Rs.19,00,000/- to the plaintiff. An advance payment of Rs.1,00,000/- was made, and a sale agreement was executed on 04.03.2004. The terms of the agreement stipulated that the defendant would ensure the eviction of tenants from the ground floor shop rooms, while the plaintiff would be responsible for evicting the tenant on the first floor. After demolishing the entire house, the plaintiff was ready to pay the sale consideration of Rs.8,00,000/- to the defendant At the time of registration, agreed to pay the balance amount of Rs.10,00,000/-. However, the defendant failed to take any action to evict the three shop room tenants or vacate the portion of the house in their possession, hindering the executi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top