SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 18094

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B.S. BHANUMATHI, J
K. Cirra Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector (Civil Supplies) – Respondent


Advocates:
KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI, GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES, HARIJA AKKINEN

COMMON ORDER:

W.P.No.5532 of 2012 is filed seeking the following relief:

“…to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the proceedings in Rc.F.No.1034/2008, dt.12-11-2008 passed by the 3rd respondent and the consequential proceedings No.Rc.CS2/5089/2008, dt.15-10-2011 and proceedings No.Rc.CS2/3199/2011, dt.18-02-2012 passed by the Respondent No.2 and 1 respectively are illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of the Essential Commodities Act and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”

b. W.P.No.10292 of 2006 is filed seeking the following relief:

“…to issue a writ or order, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ or order declaring the proceedings Rc.F/2572/2005, dt.09-08-2005 issued by the 3rd respondent and consequential proceedings in Rc.CS2/3589/2005, dt.09-11-2005 issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top