SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH - PRINCIPLAL BENCH AT ANDHRA PRADESH
M/s, Ravindra Tours and Travels – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
['V V SATISH', 'ASHOK RAM V', 'KALLA TULASI DURGAMBA', 'GP']

ORDER:

The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the action of

3rd respondent in accepting the tender of 4th respondent, who offered a 17 + 1 high back seated bus instead of 15 + 1 seated push back shift bus, thus violating the tender conditions, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to set aside the selection order of the 4th respondent and pass such other order which it deemed fit.

2. The 2nd respondent is the Indian Oil Corporation and the 3rd respondent is its Plant Manager. The 3rd respondent issued tender notification VJABP/PT/01/2020-21/Pickup bus dated 09.06.2020 inviting public tenders for positioning and operation of pick up bus for double shift operation at Kondapalli Bottling Plant (Vijayawada). The notification specified that one vehicle with specification of 15+1 seater push back shift bus was required for a contract period of one year and tender needs to be submitted by 29.06.2020 which would be opened on 30.06.2020. The petitioner and 4th respondent submitted their tenders. Though the 4th respondent did not meet the essential requirement of push back seats, however, the 2nd respondent Corporation, accepted the tender of 4th respondent be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top