SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B SYAMSUNDER
ANKARABOYINA PADMA – Appellant
Versus
TANGUDU KALAVATHI & 4 OTHERS – Respondent


ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/J.Dr-1 under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code (in short ’CPC’) against the orders passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam in E.P.No.50 of 2013 in O.S.No.111 of 2013 dated 08.12.2014 wherein and whereby learned Judge allowed the execution petition filed by the respondents 1 to 3/D.Hrs. and ordered for settlement of terms to proceed further in respect of execution petition schedule immovable property.

2. The execution petition is filed by the respondents 1 to 3/D.Hrs. under Order XXI Rule 64 and 66 CPC against the revision petitioner/J.Dr.1 for sale of mortgage schedule property belongs to late Ankaraboyina Pardha Saradhi, which is in the hands of revision petitioner/J.Dr. to realise decretal amount of Rs.5,02,444/-.

3. The case of the revision petitioner/J.Dr.1 in brief is that decree sought to be executed by the respondents 1 to 3/D.Hrs. is a mortgage decree against J.Drs.1 and 3, who are said to be succeeded mortgaged property from original mortgager late Mr. Ankaraboyina Pardha Saradhi. She submits that the mortgage property as shown in the mortgage deed is the western half of the ground floor o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top