SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 12098

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B.S. BHANUMATHI, J
SRI KOGANTI VENKATA SESHAGIRI RAO – Appellant
Versus
TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM (TTD) – Respondent


ORDER:

This revision petition is filed against the order, dated

12.08.2022, dismissing the petition in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in O.S.no.44 of 2021 on the file of the Court of X Additional District Judge, Tirupati, filed by the defendants under Section 151 CPC read with Section 32 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) to revoke the permission accorded to Dr. Subramanian Swamy to appear in this case on behalf of the plaintiff through order, dated

01.05.2021 in I.A.No.227 of 2021.

2. The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam (T.T.D), represented by its Executive Officer, the respondent, is the plaintiff. Suit is filed for damages of Rs.100 Crores. The petitioners say that the permission to Dr. Subramanian Swamy was accorded, vide orders in I.A.No.227 of 2021, dated 01.05.2021, before the defendants made appearance. They challenged the permission on the grounds briefly as follows:

Dr. Subramanian Swamy is not entitled to represent the plaintiff under Section 32 of the Act due to his motive and stand on the subject and issues involved in the suit and his personal interest in the subject matter. On according him the permission, he assumes the role of an advocate who is governed by the code of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top