SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 10688

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J
K.R.Chellappa – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER

The writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:

“… to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring action of respondents in not considering the representation dated 17.07.2018 in terms of Board Resolution No.181 dated 03.06.1991 for allotment of shops in lieu of acquisition of his residential house in 12/24, T.K.Street, Tirumala even after an elapse of 27 years as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction contrary to its own resolution besides violation of Article 14 & 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 17.07.2018 for allotment of shops in lieu of acquisition of his residential property situated in 12/24, T.K.Street, Tirumala as per Board Resolution No.181 dated 03.06.1991 forthwith and pass such other order or orders ....”.

2. The averments in the affidavit, in brief, are that the petitioner owned property in Door No. 12/24, T.K.Street, Tirumala. Petitioner running a fancy store and was eking out his livelihood. Respondent Nos.2 to 4 intended to acquire the property of the petitioner along with others for development of Tirumala Hills. Acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top