SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 19183

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3366 - B SYAMSUNDER
ALAPATI LAKSHMI CHANDANA KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
ALAPATI VENKATA SAIRAM – Respondent


ORDER:

I have heard Mr. Shoba Naidu, learned counsel, representing on behalf of Mr. A Sai Rohith, learned counsel for the petitioner.

None appeared for the respondent though served with notice.

2. This is wife’s petition underSection 24 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short C.P.C), seekingtransfer of F.C.O.P No. 1207 of 2021on the file of XIV Additional District and Sessions Court-cum- Family Court, Vijayawada to Family Court-cum-VIII Additional District and Sessions Court, Ongole, on the ground that now she is residing in her parents house at Bellampalli Village of Prakasam District along with minor child aged 3 years. The petitioner submit that she has no source of income and male support to travel a distance of 132 Kms from her parents village to Vijayawada to put forth her defence in the petition filed by the husband for restitution of conjugal rights. The petitioner submits that she lodged a report against the respondent before the SHO, MaddipaduVillage of Prakasam District on 19.08.2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A r/w 34 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, wherein after due investigation, SHO filed charge

2 BSS, J sheet before the Special Mobile

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top