SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 680

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K MANMADHA RAO, J
KONDROTHU RAMANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


ORDER :

This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:-

“…to set aside the impugned proceedings vide Lr.No.731/2015- P9, dated 29.9.2015 issued by 3rd respondent rejecting the request of the Applicant herein seeking compassionate appointment, as illegal, irregular and violative of principles of natural justice and consequentially appoint the applicant on compassionate grounds in a suitable post in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders.”

2. Brief facts of the case are that the father of the petitioner was initially appointed as an Attender in 3rd respondent department and while in service he was expired on 27.07.2002 due to ill health. Thereafter, in the year 2003, the petitioner herein made an application to the respondent authorities with a request to appoint him on compassionate grounds. The said application was rejected by the respondents vide proceedings D.S.No.1200/04/P1 dated 18.06.2004 on the ground that petitioner’s mother Smt K. Narayanamma has been working as Sweeper in DRDA. In the year 2012, the petitioner’s mother superannuated without any pension facility. Thereafter, due to financial crisis, the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top