SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 8959

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B.S. BHANUMATHI, J
ALLENA SIVA DAS – Appellant
Versus
ALLENA NAGARATNAM @ RAMADEVI – Respondent


ORDER:

This revision petition is filed against the common order and decree dated 01.04.2023 allowing I.A.No.43/2023 in HMOP No.27/2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge Rajam, filed under Order XVIII, Rule 17 r/w Section 151 C.P.C. by the respondent No.1 in the divorce petition, seeking recall of herself to receive her additional chief affidavit for evidence in the main proceedings.

2. The parties are arraigned in the same manner as before the trial Court in the main proceedings.

3. The petitioner filed HMOP.No.27 of 2010 seeking divorce. During the course of the enquiry, the respondent No.1 filed the evidence in her chief-examination without describing the identity particulars of oath in form No.14 r/w Rule 39 of the Civil Rules of Practice, 1980. Without noticing the same, the cross-examination was started and the objection was raised. Thereafter, the petition in I.A.No.42 of 2023 and in I.A.No.43 of 2023 were filed to recall the respondent No.1 and to receive the additional chief affidavit. Though the petition was opposed, the trial Court allowed both petitions by observing that the affidavit of the 1st respondent without containing descriptive particulars viz., na

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top