SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 3652

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3366 - B SYAMSUNDER
The Branch Manager – Appellant
Versus
Kota Raju – Respondent


ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short C.P.C) against the orders passed by learned Junior Civil Judge, Rajam in E.A. No.42 of 2018 in E.P. No.44 of 2015 in O.S. No.85 of 2012 dated 03.03.2020 wherein and whereby the Executing Court called for salary particulars of revision petitioner through Regional Manager as he failed to comply the attachment orders passed by the Executing Court being a Garnishee.

2. The First Respondent/DHR filed O.S. No.85 of 2012 against 2nd respondent for recovery of the debt borrowed by her husband wherein he obtained a decree and also filed petition seeking attachment before judgment in I.A. No.1033 of 2012 under Order 38 Rule 5 of C.P.C wherein LIC Policy amount payable to 2nd respondent a sum of Rs.1,11,229/- (Rupees One Lakh Eleven Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty Nine Only) has been attached. After that on contest by Revision Petitioner, I.A. No.1033 of 2012 was dismissed on 09.07.2014. Then 1st respondent obtained decree against 2nd respondent and filed Execution Petition under Order 21 Rule 52 of C.P.C for attachment of Rs.70,558/- (Rupees

2 BSS, J Seventy Thousand Five Hundre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top