SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 7168

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
NINALA JAYASURYA, J
PYREDDY BALA CHANDRA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER:

Heard Mr.S.M.Subhani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

Also heard learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare and Mr.Shaik Kareemullah, Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respective respondents.

2. The present Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the Errata Notification published in the A.P. Gazette W.No.32 dated 13.08.2019 to the A.P. Gazette Notification No.43A, Supply, Part-II dated 24.10.1963 at Sl.No.3124 in Pages 30 & 31 under Column No.9 in so far as inclusion of the land in Sy.No.154 to an extent of Ac.4.00 cents and in Sy.No.155 to an extent of Ac.4.00 cents, totaling to Ac.8.00 cents of the petitioner No.1 and residential plots of petitioner Nos.2 to 8 situated in Munagalapadu Village, Kurnool Mandal, Kurnool District, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, without jurisdiction, contrary to the provisions of the Wakf Act and for a consequential direction to the respondents not to interfere with the ongoing constructions by the petitioner Nos.2 to 8 and pass such other orders as this Court deems fit.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners referring to the averments made in the Writ Affidavit and various provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995, a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top