SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 22436

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J
J LAKSHMANA RAJU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


ORDER:

Challenging the legal validity of the impugned order, dated 30.01.2023, passed by the 2nd respondent, the instant Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner.

2) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for the 1st respondent; and Sri N. Ranga Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities, appearing for the 2nd respondent.

3) The petitioner has been in possession and enjoyment of the land in an extent of 24 x 35 feet situate in Survey No.301/2 of Puttur Town, Tirupati District. He has been doing a petty business in running a fancy store in a shed erected in the said land and eking out his livelihood.

4) Whileso, earlier a notice dated 05.01.2023 was issued by the 2nd respondent Municipality to the petitioner alleging that he has encroached on to the said land and sought to evict him from the said land. The said notice was issued under Sections 189 and 192 of the A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965. The petitioner challenged the validity of the said notice in W.P.No.790 of 2023 before this Court. This Court has disposed of the said Writ Petition directing the petitioner to treat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top