SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 4687

APHC010123482024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3332]

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI W</b>RI</b></b></b>T </b>PE</b>TI</b></b></b>TI</b></b></b>ON</b></b> </b>N</b></b>O:</b> </b>6</b>49</b>5/2024 Between:

M/s Bsr Infracon, ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The short grievance of the petitioner is that, despite finalizing the bill, the respondent authorities are not paying the admitted due amount of Rs.77,63,069/- in relation to three works executed for 8th respondent- Mangalagiri-Tadepalli Municipal Corporation under agreements bearing Nos.638/2022-23, 716/2022-23 and 154/2023-24.

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, Sri M.Manohar Reddy, learned standing counsel for Mangalagiri-Tadepalli Municipal Corporation, while placing the written instructions of the Commissioner, dated 22.04.2024 on record, submitted that the respondent authorities have admitted the bill of the petitioner, but due to lack of General funds, the Corporation is unable to make payments to the petitioner and the Corporation is ready to make payments immediately after the availability of General Funds and sought three months time for payment of the said amount.

3. To the said submission, Sri Sasanka Bhuvanagiri, learned counsel for the petitioner, requested to record the said written instructions and prayed to pass appropriate orders in that regard.

4. On perusal of the written instructions of the Commissioner, Mangalagiri- Tadepalli Municipal Corporation dated 22.04.2024 would indicate that due to lack of general funds, the Corporation is unable to make payments and is ready to make payments to the petitioner immediately after the availability of General funds.

5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and taking the submission of learned counsel for the parties into consideration, as the authorities intend to pay the admitted due amount to the petitioner, there is no purpose in keeping this Writ Petition pending inviting counter. As such, this Court is inclined to dispose of the same, with the consent of both the parties, at the admission stage itself, by passing the following order:

“The respondent authorities are directed to release an amount of Rs.77,63,069/- (Rupees Seventy Seven Lakhs Sixty Three Thousand Sixty Nine only) to the petitioner within a period of three(3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It would be open to the petitioner to agitate its claim for interest, if any, payable by the respondents, if it is so advised, in an appropriate forum.”

6. Accordingly, the Writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed.

____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

22.04.2024

MP

220 THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO.6495 OF 2024

22.04.2024 MP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top