SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 4687

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
M/s BSR Infracon – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER:

The short grievance of the petitioner is that, despite finalizing the bill, the respondent authorities are not paying the admitted due amount of Rs.77,63,069/- in relation to three works executed for 8th respondent- Mangalagiri-Tadepalli Municipal Corporation under agreements bearing Nos.638/2022-23, 716/2022-23 and 154/2023-24.

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, Sri M.Manohar Reddy, learned standing counsel for Mangalagiri-Tadepalli Municipal Corporation, while placing the written instructions of the Commissioner, dated 22.04.2024 on record, submitted that the respondent authorities have admitted the bill of the petitioner, but due to lack of General funds, the Corporation is unable to make payments to the petitioner and the Corporation is ready to make payments immediately after the availability of General Funds and sought three months time for payment of the said amount.

3. To the said submission, Sri Sasanka Bhuvanagiri, learned counsel for the petitioner, requested to record the said written instructions and prayed to pass appropriate orders in that regard.

4. On perusal of the written instructions of the Commissioner, Mangalagiri- Tadepalli Municipal C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top