SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 22556

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3396 - VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Sri Yarragudi Srinivasulu Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, [APHC010080272024] has been filed by the Petitioner/A.2, aggrieved by issuance of the summons dated 09.01.2024 to him in CC No.903 of 2022 on the file of the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kurnool.

2. The brief facts of the case are that:

i) Petitioner is A.2 and Respondent No.2 is the de facto Complainant in the above case. Prior to date of filing of the complaint, on 22.07.2020 de facto complainant/Respondent No.2 along with other officials inspected the shop of L.Ws.4 and 5/Chitrala Vinod Kumar and Maka Lakshmaiah Setti and Simat pesticides, collected samples for quality analysis. On 28.08.2020 they received the analytical results of the Simate (thorte-19 gms according to which, 0% active

1. For short ‘the Code’

ingredient in the pesticide is found. On 29.08.2020, de facto Complainant visited the shops and seized the available stock of Simate under the cover of panchanama in the presence of L.Ws.6 and 7/Panchayathdars. iii) Basing on the Panchanama, Police registered a case in Crime No.407 of 2020 of Nandikotkur Urban Police Station against A.1 and A.2 for the offence pun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top