Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
N. HARINATH, J
B. Sunkanna – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman Managing Director – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's employment and allegations of misconduct. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of disciplinary actions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. judicial review standards and delegation of disciplinary authority. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. conclusion dismissing the writ petition. (Para 17 , 18) |
ORDER :
The petitioner is challenging the order of dismissal dated 29.12.2003 and seeks a consequential direction to reinstate the petitioner into service together with all consequential benefits.
2. The petitioner started his carrier at the respondent in the year 1992 and was working as a Junior Officer. He also worked as PS to the Chairman and Managing Director of the respondent/company during the years 1993 to 2001. Enquiry was initiated on the acts of omission and commission while discharging his role as PS to Chairman and Managing Director. The specific allegations related to the conduct of petitioner affairs at the Guesthouse for the period 1998-2001.
3. An enquiry was conducted against four officers including the petitioner who was working as Junior Officer-Guesthouse. The petitioner was charged with the allegation of embezzlement of com
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
