Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Dr. V R K Krupa Sagar, J
The United India Insurance Co Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Karu Nukalamma 3 Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. negligence resulting in death of tupakula raju. (Para 5) |
| 2. definition of legal representatives and claimants. (Para 6 , 7 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. assessment of compensation under various heads. (Para 8 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. arguments regarding entitlement to compensation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. final decision on compensation award and liability. (Para 22 , 23) |
COMMON JUDGMENT:
under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , is filed by the insurance company assailing the award dated 18.04.2013 of the learned Chairman, Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VI Additional District Judge (F.T.C.), Guntur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Claims Tribunal’) in M.V.O.P.No.97 of 2010.
2. under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 , is filed by the second wife of the deceased assailing the award dated 18.04.2013 of the learned Chairman, Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VI Additional District Judge (F.T.C.), Guntur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Claims Tribunal’) in M.V.O.P.No.97 of 2010.
3. Heard arguments of Sri N.Nageswara Rao, the learned counsel for appellant-Insurance Company and Sri G.V.S.Mehar Kumar, the learned counsel for respondent No.4 in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
