SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3520 - A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
M/S. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
S.RAMANAMMA & 5 OTHERS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. M/s. Oriental Insurance Company Limited / Respondent No.3 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional District Judge, Parvatipuram, Vizianagaram District (for short “the learned MACT”) filed the present appeal disputing sustainability of decree and order dated 23.09.2015 passed by the learned MACT, where under a claim made by the dependents and legal representatives of one S. Chinnayya (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”), for his death in a motor vehicle accident for Rs.5,00,000/- was allowed for Rs.3,96,000/-. The appellant / Insurance Company is disputing the liability in all aspects.

2. Respondent Nos.1 to 4 herein are the claimants. Respondent No.5 is the driver of the lorry bearing No.AP 35 U 6039 (hereinafter referred to as “the offending vehicle”). Respondent No.6 is the owner of the offending vehicle.

Respondent Nos.5 and 6 remained as ex parte.

Case of the claimants:

3(i). On the fateful day i.e. 11.07.2012, the deceased boarded the offending vehicle as a quarry labourer along with the co-labourer and cleaner, when they were reached near the lands of Cheeluri Krishna, Cherukupalli Village, within the limits of Pachipenta Police Station, Vizia

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top