SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Vatsavayi Satyanarayana Raju, – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent


ORDER:

1. This writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed, questioning the action of 3rd respondent herein/Tahsildar, Undrajavaram Mandal, West Godavari District in initiating proceedings under Section 7 of A.P Land Encroachment Act III of 1905 (for short the Act), interfering with peaceful possession of petitioners over land admeasuring Ac.0.47 cents and Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.226/8 of Satyavedu village, Undrajavaram Mandal, West Godavari District, declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction.

2. The petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are the absolute owners of land admeasuring Ac.0.47 cents situated in Sy.No.226/8, having purchased the same under registered sale deed dated 05.10.1983, similarly, 3rd petitioner is the absolute owner of land admeasuring Ac.0.50 cents in Sy.No.226/8 of Satyavedu village, Undrajavaram Mandal, West Godavari District, having inherited from his ancestors under Will dated 15.01.1952, possession of petitioners is not in dispute, because 3rd respondent issued notice under Section 7 of the Act. According to the petitioners, land in Sy.No.226/8 is classified as gramakantam, it is under cultivation by raising paddy crop. As per not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top