SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21609

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3396 - VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
SANTOSH KUMAR BAVISETTY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


COMMON ORDER:

Above enumerated Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by different petitioners, and they commonly pray for;

“….a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents specifically Respondent No.4 to take cognizance of the petitioners' complaints dated 04.11.2023 and 06.11.2023 respectively and follow the due process of law as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others in 1 Writ Petition (Criminal) No.68 of 2008 as any contrary would be violative of the said judgment”.

2. These Writ Petitions were heard together as the same question of law is involved and the same are disposed of by way of this common order at admission stage, with the consent of learned counsel representing both parties. Before venturing into the determination of the prayers sought, it is essential to draw the contours of necessary facts that are emanating from the W.Ps.

3. The facts which led to filing of W.P.No.29945 of 2023, are:

i. It is the case of the Petitioner that he is a distant relative of one Santosh Kumar Bavisetty. It is stated that one Malathi, W/o. Santosh Kumar and her brother Mahesh, with an intenti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top