HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3396 - VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
SANTOSH KUMAR BAVISETTY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
COMMON ORDER:
Above enumerated Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, by different petitioners, and they commonly pray for;
“….a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents specifically Respondent No.4 to take cognizance of the petitioners' complaints dated 04.11.2023 and 06.11.2023 respectively and follow the due process of law as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others in 1 Writ Petition (Criminal) No.68 of 2008 as any contrary would be violative of the said judgment”.
2. These Writ Petitions were heard together as the same question of law is involved and the same are disposed of by way of this common order at admission stage, with the consent of learned counsel representing both parties. Before venturing into the determination of the prayers sought, it is essential to draw the contours of necessary facts that are emanating from the W.Ps.
3. The facts which led to filing of W.P.No.29945 of 2023, are:
i. It is the case of the Petitioner that he is a distant relative of one Santosh Kumar Bavisetty. It is stated that one Malathi, W/o. Santosh Kumar and her brother Mahesh, with an intenti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.