SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21132

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3396 - VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Addanki Pavan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


COMMON ORDER:

The Petitioners in both cases preferred the above petitions challenging the very same Order dated 11.02.2022 passed in Criminal Revision Petition No.34 of 2020 on the file of the Court of XVI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nandigama, Krishna District, granting maintenance of Rs.5000/- per month to the wife.

2. For the sake of convenience and better understanding, wife be referred as the Petitioner and husband be referred as Respondent or interchangeably, in the present order.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the marriage of the Respondent took place on 30.03.1991 and the couple were blessed with two female children out of their wedlock. It is stated that the Wife was necked out from the matrimonial house and she preferred M.C.No.28 of 2017 on the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class-cum- Additional Junior Civil Judge, Jaggaiahpet. On the other hand, husband filed divorce petition H.M.O.P.No.77 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda, on the grounds of cruelty, desertion and adultery. The said case was decreed in favour of the husband, against which, the wife has preferred C.M.A. and obtained order of s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top