SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 21678

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
Paruchuri S.Choudhari – Appellant
Versus
The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India – Respondent


ORDER:

The short grievance of the petitioners is to declare the action of respondent Nos.1 to 5 in permitting respondent No.6 to construct Jio 5th Generation Mobile Signal Tower in middle of residential houses at Bethapudi Village, Repalle Mandal, Guntur District, without obtaining NOC from the villagers and also the action of respondent No.6, in constructing the said tower, as illegal, arbitrary.

2. Heard Sri Peeta Raman, learned counsel representing Sri Borra Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri M.Sudheer, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.5 and Ms.Prasanthi Gude, learned Assistant Government Pleader.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the petitioners cannot say that NOC is required from the villagers for establishment of Jio Cell Tower and there is no rule as such in that regard. She further submitted that G.O.Ms.No.334 dated 09.10.2012, G.O.Ms.No.420 dated 24.09.2013 and G.O.Ms.No.75 dated 29.07.2015, which govern the procedure for establishment of towers, contains no rule showing that NOC has to be obtained from the villagers to erect a cell tower in the village, as such, the writ petition is misconceived, devoid of merits an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top