SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 19176

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B.S. BHANUMATHI, J
ANNEX REALITY VENTURES PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
SHINAGAM VENKATA SATYANARAYANA – Respondent


COMMON ORDER:

The civil revision petition No.1349 of 2022 is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the orders dated 04.05.2022 dismissing the I.A.No.97 of 2022 in O.S.No.404 of 2021 on the file of Court of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vishakapatnam filed under Section 153 of CPC to amend the name of respondent No.3 as “Shingam Naresh, Son of Late S.Jagadeswara Rao, Hindu, Aged about

35 years”.

2. The civil revision petition No.1351 of 2022 is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the orders dated 04.05.2022 dismissing the I.A.No.96 of 2022 in O.S.No.404 of 2021 on the file of Court of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vishakapatnam filed under Section 153 of CPC to amend the name of respondent No.3 as “Shingam Naresh, Son of Late S.Jagadeswara Rao, Hindu, Aged about

35 years”.

3. The petitioners filed suit against respondents No.1 to 6 for permanent injunction. As the suit summons and the notice in I.A.No.243 of 2021 filed in the suit seeking interim injunction were returned with the endorsement R3 died, the petition in I.A.No.97 of 2022 and I.A.No.96 of 2022 are filed. The petitioner contended that after return of the summons and notices their e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top