SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 9485

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
G JOHN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


ORDER:

The instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C) has been filed, by the petitioner/Accused seeking quashment of impugned order passed on 25.11.2019 in Crl.Mp.No.1767 of 2019 in C.C.No.391 of 2018 on the file of the Court of Judicial magistrate of First class, Railway Kodure, YSR Kadapa District, registered for the offence 138 read with 142 of Negotiable instruments Act, 1881 (in short N.I Act).

2. The petitioner herein is an accused in C.C.No.391 of 2018. During the pendency of the said case, the petitioner herein filed Crl.M.P.No.1767 of 2019 before the Trial Court seeking to summon two witnesses on his behalf. But the learned Trial Judge allowed the petition in part permitting the petitioner to summon Ramanaiah Naidu and dismissed the request of summoning another witness by name Malakala Narayana. Aggrieved by the impugned order, the petitioner/Accused preferred present petition, seeking to quash the order on the ground that the petitioner has taken a plea that there is no relation between the petitioner and one Malakala Narayana that is why he wants to examine him as a witness. It is alleged against him that Malakala Narayana is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top