SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(AP) 5750

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CHITTURI SREEKANTH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

Since the issue involved in these writ petitions is one and the same, they are disposed of by this common order.

2. The above writ petitions are filed impugning the action of respondents in screening off the building permissions without issuing any notice or there being any order, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Rule 26 of the Andhra Pradesh Building Rules, 2017 (for short ‘the Rules’), violation of principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 19 and 300-A of the Constitution of India.

3. a) The averments germane to decide the issue are as follows: The writ petitioners are bonafide purchasers/ transferees, having purchased TDRs from the registered owners. Pursuant to the purchase of TDRs from the respective owners they applied for sanction of building permissions. The Urban Local bodies/authorities granted permission to construct structure upon considering TDR bonds, as per the Rules in vogue.

b) The Commissioner of Tanuku Municipality (hereinafter referred to as Commissioner) awarded 17 TDR bonds in relation to land of an extent of Ac.18-55 cents, in R.S.Nos.226(P), 227(P), 228(P), 232(P) 233(P), 234(P) and 235(P) of Tanuku, earmarked, for purpose of parks/garde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top