SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 3046

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B.S. BHANUMATHI, J
DANIREDDY NARASIMHA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
P. SASHIDAR REDDY, GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

ORDER:

This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the following relief:

“…to issue an appropriate writ order or direction under Article 226 of constitution of India more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings in ref. B/2115/2024 dated 23.12.2024 issued by the respondent No.3 as arbitrary and illegal, contrary objectives of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh State Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Orders, 2018 and contrary to the well established legal principles apart from being violative of the fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed to me under Articles 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and drop all the further proceedings in pursuance of the same and pass…”

2. The case of the petitioner is briefly as follows:

The petitioner is a permanent dealer of fair price shop no.1104014 at Rajupalem village, Jammalamadugu mandal, YSR district. On 06.08.2024 the 3rd respondent came to the shop and after conducting inspection, recorded variation in the stock. The 3rd respondent issued show cause notice dated 12.08.2024 for submission of explanation. The petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top