SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 3313

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J
J GEETHA, CHITTOOR & ANR – Appellant
Versus
MOULABASHA, CHITTOOR DIST & ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: T C KRISHNAN

JUDGMENT

1. One A. Jyotiraj (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) while on the side of the road on 29.10.2014 met with an accident caused by the driver of the auto bearing No.AP 03 TC 4721 (hereinafter referred to as “the offending vehicle”) and succumbed to injuries. Appellant Nos.1 and 2 being wife and son of the deceased, filed M.V.O.P.No.180 of 2015 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VIII Additional District Judge, Chittoor (for short “the MACT”) claiming a compensation of Rs.20,00,00/- and the same was allowed-in-part granting a compensation of Rs.7,88,000/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% by the learned MACT. Dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation granted, the present appeal is filed.

2. Respondent No.1 is the owner-cum-driver of the offending vehicle remained ex parte before the learned MACT and Respondent No.2 is the Insurance Company with which the offending vehicle was insured.

Case of claimants:

3. The deceased was hale and healthy. Claimant No.1 is the wife and Claimant No.2 is the son and they are the only legal heirs of the deceased. On 29.12.2014 at about 9.30 am, the accident occurred when the driver of the offending vehicle negligently da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top