The Court made the following order:

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the State.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 17.02.2025. The learned counsel further submits that representation for securing the C.C.T.V. footage of Patamata police station from 10.02.2025 to 15.02.2025 in connection with crime No.86 of 2025 of Patamata police station, Vijayawada. The learned counsel also submits that C.C.T.V. footage which is recorded at the Patamata police station is crucial for the case registered against the husband of the petitioner.

3. On 05.03.2025, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that C.C.T.V. footage would generally be stored for one year.

4. Today, the learned Special Government Pleader representing the State submits that the petitioner, who is the wife of the accused, has submitted a representation and that she cannot maintain the writ petition. It is also submitted by the learned Special Government Pleader that the C.C.T.V. footage would in any way be stor