SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 1303

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J
Kalavakuru Srinivas Kumar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Kalavakuru @Revuru Sujatha @Lakshmi Sujatha – Respondent
CRLRC 600/2024



Advocates:
SANDEEP BHAVAN PAMARATI, S V MUNI REDDY, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Disclosure statements are mandatory in domestic violence cases to determine maintenance, ensuring previous orders are considered to avoid conflicting judgments.

Headnote:(A) Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 - Sections 18, 19, 20, and 22 - Domestic Violence Case filed by wife against husband - Maintenance and compensation awarded by Magistrate - Appeal dismissed by Sessions Judge - No disclosure statements filed by either party regarding financial status - Court remands case for fresh disposal with direction to file disclosure statements. (Paras 3, 10, 11)

(B) Maintenance - Requirement of disclosure statements - Both parties must disclose financial information to determine appropriate maintenance amount - Previous maintenance orders must be considered in subsequent proceedings to avoid conflicting orders. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, husband, challenged the order of the Magistrate that partly allowed the Domestic Violence Case, awarding maintenance and compensation to the wife. The Sessions Judge confirmed this order, leading to the present revision. (Paras 2, 4)

Findings of Court:
The case is remanded for fresh disposal to ensure both parties file disclosure statements regarding their financial status, which is essential for determining maintenance. (Paras 10, 11)

Issues: The main issues were the absence of disclosure statements from both parties and the need to reassess maintenance based on financial disclosures. (Paras 6, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity of disclosure statements in domestic violence cases to accurately assess maintenance and avoid overlapping jurisdiction in multiple proceedings. (Paras 9, 10)

Result: Criminal Revision Case allowed; order set aside and remanded for fresh disposal.

O R D E R:

This Criminal Revision Case was filed by the petitioner herein/husband, against the Judgment dated 03.05.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal No.37 of 2023 by the learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore (for brevity ‘the learned Sessions Judge’).

2. The petitioner herein is the husband of respondent No.1 and father of respondent No.2. The respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein filed Domestic Violence Case (for brevity ‘DVC’) No.27 of 2016 under Sections 18 , 19 , 20 and 22 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for brevity ‘the DVC Act’) against the petitioner herein/husband on the file of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class for trial of Prohibition and Excise Offences, Nellore (for brevity ‘the learned Magistrate’).

3. The learned Magistrate, after full-fledged trial, and after examining the entire evidence brought on record, vide Order, dated 09.12.2022 partly allowed the DVC No.27 of 2016, operative portion of which is as under:

“18. In the result, the petitioner/complaint is partly allowed, an amount of Rs.10,000/- has already granted by this Court towards maintenance and Rs.7,000/- is already granted by the Hon’ble Family Court, Nellore as maintenance, this Court is of the opinion that it would be sufficient for the petitioners for their day to day needs as monthly maintenance from the date of this order. In this regard, this Court is of the opinion that as maintenance is already granted and no further maintenance need to be granted. The 1st respondent is directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- towards marriage expenses to the 1st petitioner/aggrieved person. The 1st respondent is directed to pay an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- towards compensation to the 1st petitioner/aggrieved person for the acts of domestic violence committed by him to the 1st petitioner/aggrieved person. An amount of Rs.4,000/- is granted for alternative accommodation earlier in Crl.M.P.No.1120/2016 and the same is continued.

Crl.M.P.No.380/2020 in Crl.M.P.No.1120/2016 is pending for payment of arrears of Rs.1,90,000/- and the 1st respondent is directed to pay the same within three months from the date of this order.

In Crl.M.P.No.691/2019 in Crl.M.P.No.1120/2017 in D.V.C.No.27/2016 previously on 08.01.2020 there is a direction to the garnishee of the 1st respondent i.e. Mandal Educational Officer, Nellore Rural Mandal, Railway Feeders Road, Nellore Corporation, SPSR Nellore District to attach the arrears of interim maintenance and accommodation of Rs.80,000/- pertaining to Crl.M.P.No.914/2017 and Rs.2,70,000/- pertaining to Crl.M.P.No.691/2019 i.e. total Rs.3,50,000/- from the salary of the respondent as per law.

In Crl.M.P.No.914/2017, Crl.M.P.No.691/2019 as garnishee of the 1st respondent is already directed to attach salary of the 1st respondent, the maintenance is granted to the petitioners only from the date of order and not from the date of filing of the petition. Crl.M.Ps if any, further pending shall stands dismissed. The petition is dismissed in respect of other reliefs.”

4. Aggrieved by the said Order, the petitioner herein/husband preferred appeal vide Criminal Appeal No.37 of 2023 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge. The learned Sessions Judge, after appreciating the entire evidence, vide Judgment, dated 03.05.2024, dismissed the Criminal Appeal No.37 of 2023, confirming the Order, dated 09.12.2022 passed in DVC No.27 of 2016 by the learned Magistrate. Challenging the judgment passed in the appeal by the learned Sessions Judge, the present Criminal Revision Case was filed.

5. Heard both sides. Perused the record.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein/husband would contend that no disclosure statement was filed by the respondent No.1 herein/wife and without the said statement, it is difficult to estimate the financial expenses of either of the parties to come to a conclusion as to how much amount is to be awarded to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 towards maintenance.

7. Learned counsel f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top