HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
B.S. BHANUMATHI, J
CHILUVURI RAJAM RAJU – Appellant
Versus
DATLA SATYANARAYANA RAJU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. suit for recovery (Para 2 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16) |
| 2. application for ink age (Para 3) |
| 3. opposition to application (Para 4) |
| 4. revision petition outcome (Para 15) |
ORDER:
This petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against Order dated 29.02.2024 dismissing I.A.No.32 of 2024 in O.S.No.1175 of 2019 on the file of the Court of V Additional Civil judge (Junior Division) at Kakinada filed by the defendant under Section 45 of the Evidence Act, 1872 read with Section 151 CPC to send the suit promissory note dated 02.11.2016 marked as Ex.A1 to a Government forensic lab to determine the age of the ink used in Ex.A1.
2. The respondent filed the suit against the petitioner for recovery of Rs.13,73,866/- (Principal amount of Rs.8,00,000/-) basing on Ex.A1. The petitioner filed a written statement denying borrowal of any amount at any time from the plaintiff and pleading, among other grounds, that the pronote was forged and fabricated and not executed nor was it signed by him and that the suit was filed to harass him and his family members in view of some dispute between his brother and the plaintiff. It is further pleaded that h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.