Back
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J
DASYAM SUBHASINI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' defense (Para 3) |
| 2. state's position (Para 4) |
| 3. point for determination (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. inherent powers of high court (Para 6) |
| 5. allegations and evidence (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 6. specific allegations required (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER
The instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731 has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in S.C.No.131 of 2021 on the file of the For short ‘Cr.P.C’
Court of XI Additional District Judge-cum-Special Court for SC & ST Cases, Visakahpatnam for the offences punishable under Sections 448 and 509 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code2 and Section 3 (1) (g) (r) (s) read with 3 (2) (va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, [For short ‘SCST Act’]
2. Heard Sri K.Jyothi Prasad, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for State/Respondent No.1. In spite of providing sufficient opportunity, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 did not turn up to submit arguments.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Petitioners have not committed any o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
