COMMON ORDER:

These revisions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India questioning the order dated 25.11.2019 passed in I.A.Nos.640 and 639 of 2019 in O.S.No.202 of 2015 respectively by the Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasthi, whereby the petitions filed under Section 151 and under Order XVIII Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short “C.P.C.”) to reopen the suit and to send the disputed suit promissory note Ex.A.1 to the Government Hand Writing Expert were dismissed by the trial Court by Common Order.

The petitions filed by the petitioner before the trial Court under Section 151 and under Order XVIII Rule 17 of C.P.C. were dismissed on the ground that the petitioner raised a specific plea in his written statement that the suit document is forged one and to substantiate his contention, he filed the present petitions to refer the promissory note to the Government Hand Writing Expert for his opinion. While deciding the petitions, the trial Court made serious observations on merits of the main suit with reference to the plea of forgery in paragraph No.3 of the order under challenge before this Court.

During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner drawn the attention